Re: [9fans] DNS dynamic update

2010-03-18 Thread erik quanstrom
> FWIW there is another weirdness of windows, the windows DHCP server doesn't > communicate with the DNS server on windows, it expects the client to send an > Inform packet to the DHCP server telling it of the clients chosen name. i guess that's the great thing about standards — there are so many

Re: [9fans] DNS dynamic update

2010-03-17 Thread Steve Simon
It looks from my reading from of dhcpd.c that you could just tweek windows (the registry I assume) and make windows ask for the domain, in which case dhcpd should supply it. If you hate this idea then I think the change to add windows specific dhcp options would be easy - there is already a specia

Re: [9fans] DNS dynamic update

2010-03-17 Thread Benjamin Huntsman
>> (because it supplies the correct info for non-Plan 9 hosts). > >What info did your hosts need that Plan 9's dhcpd didn't supply? Specifically, Plan 9's dhcpd does not supply a context-specific DNS suffix (ie, default domain name), which Windows systems need in order to resolve hosts by short

Re: [9fans] DNS dynamic update

2010-03-17 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
> (because it supplies the correct info for non-Plan 9 hosts). What info did your hosts need that Plan 9's dhcpd didn't supply?

[9fans] DNS dynamic update

2010-03-17 Thread Benjamin Huntsman
Hi! I'm trying to set up an application(don't ask :) ) on my LAN that more-or-less requires the ability to perform dynamic updates of DNS. I'm currently using a Plan 9 system to serve DNS, but DHCP is being served by a FreeBSD machine (because it supplies the correct info for non-Plan 9 host