On Nov 4, 2008, at 9:16 PM, ron minnich wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 3, 2008, at 9:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frankly, I was trying to see whether an external process reading
on somebody else's /proc/n/note would make any sense.
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 18:48 +, Brian L. Stuart wrote:
Frankly, I was trying to see whether an external process reading
on somebody else's /proc/n/note would make any sense. One thing
that I wanted to implement was a note thief process that would
constantly read on a target's
On Nov 3, 2008, at 9:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frankly, I was trying to see whether an external process reading
on somebody else's /proc/n/note would make any sense. One thing
that I wanted to implement was a note thief process that would
constantly read on a target's /proc/n/note and
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 3, 2008, at 9:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frankly, I was trying to see whether an external process reading
on somebody else's /proc/n/note would make any sense. One thing
that I wanted to implement was a note
I've been experimenting with how Plan 9 handles notes for processes and
I must confess that I'm now confused and in need your help.
First of all, the proc(3) man page says that A read [from /proc/n/
note] of at least ERRLEN
characters will retrieve the oldest note posted to the process and
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 08:03 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
what is the point of reading /proc/n/ note for anything but a
stopped/borken process?
or a process already in a note handler?
Could you elaborate, please? Do you mean that if the process
enters its note handler, then the sure fire
Frankly, I was trying to see whether an external process reading
on somebody else's /proc/n/note would make any sense. One thing
that I wanted to implement was a note thief process that would
constantly read on a target's /proc/n/note and handle the notes
externally using a different kind of
Frankly, I was trying to see whether an external process reading
on somebody else's /proc/n/note would make any sense. One thing
that I wanted to implement was a note thief process that would
constantly read on a target's /proc/n/note and handle the notes
externally using a different kind of IPC
Frankly, I was trying to see whether an external process reading
on somebody else's /proc/n/note would make any sense. One thing
that I wanted to implement was a note thief process that would
constantly read on a target's /proc/n/note and handle the notes
externally using a
Guys,
I've been experimenting with how Plan 9 handles notes for processes and
I must confess that I'm now confused and in need your help.
First of all, the proc(3) man page says that A read [from /proc/n/
note] of at least ERRLEN
characters will retrieve the oldest note posted to the process
10 matches
Mail list logo
