Quoth Romano :
> References:
>
> Subject: RUDP and/or others
>
> I know this is from a thread almost 8 years old on 9fans.
>
> I'm ignorant of why RUDP wasn't used in lieu of TCP for 9P
> connections. Anyone know the whys and wherefores (either technical,
> historical, or political)? I had re
On 19 October 2015 at 20:31, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> I seem to remember IL being more complex than just a UDP with counters
> and ACK, which is what I'm - sort of - looking for.
>
I think you might find Plan 9's rudp is essentially that. Conversations are
determined by
a generation number; pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:31:43 +0200
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:15:13 -0700
> >Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:36:55 +0200
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7738449.html (no Google allowed)
>
> I only read the abstract and found "pathstar" mentioned in references.
> - From a Bell Labs Technical Journal, no l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:28:13 +0200
>hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Do I understand correctly, you just want to avoid having to implement
> the complexities of TCP on an fpga? If there was a TCP IP core would
> you buy it?
> Why does VNC require an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:59:44 -0700
>erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> On Sun Oct 18 16:16:59 PDT 2015, 9...@9netics.com wrote:
> > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw
> > > one a year ago, but I just can't remember what it was!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:15:13 -0700
>Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com> wrote:
>
> > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw
> > one a year ago, but I just can't remember what it was!
>
> are you looking for Internet Link (IL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:14:46 +0100
>Charles Forsyth wrote:
>
> On 18 October 2015 at 23:43, Aleksandar Kuktin
> wrote:
>
> > BAM! I run straight into RUDP. "Designed at Bell Labs for the Plan 9
> > operating system". I just skimmed through the (exp
Do I understand correctly, you just want to avoid having to implement
the complexities of TCP on an fpga? If there was a TCP IP core would
you buy it?
Why does VNC require an fpga, are you going to transfer enormous resolutions?
If yes then I personally would use UDP and a lossy and loss tolerant
c
On 18 October 2015 at 23:43, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> BAM! I run straight into RUDP. "Designed at Bell Labs for the Plan 9
> operating system". I just skimmed through the (expired) IETF draft from
> 1999 and I honestly think the design might be too much. It looks like
> it's almost completely l
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 05:35:40PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> for clarity, i was neither recommending or not recommending rudp, as i know
> nothing about the problem to be solved except for the tidbits "fpga" and
> "vnc",
> neither of which are something i've spent much time with.
>
> good
On Sun Oct 18 17:11:11 PDT 2015, k...@sciops.net wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 04:59:44PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > On Sun Oct 18 16:16:59 PDT 2015, 9...@9netics.com wrote:
> > > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw one a
> > > > year ago, but I just can't re
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 04:59:44PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Sun Oct 18 16:16:59 PDT 2015, 9...@9netics.com wrote:
> > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw one a
> > > year ago, but I just can't remember what it was!
> >
> > are you looking for Internet Link (
On Sun Oct 18 15:53:44 PDT 2015, akuk...@gmail.com wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:43:56 +0200
> >Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>
> > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw one a
> > year ago, but I just can't remem
On Sun Oct 18 16:16:59 PDT 2015, 9...@9netics.com wrote:
> > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw one a
> > year ago, but I just can't remember what it was!
>
> are you looking for Internet Link (IL)?
there's also rudp, which if i have gotten my second-hand stories str
> Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw one a
> year ago, but I just can't remember what it was!
are you looking for Internet Link (IL)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:43:56 +0200
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw one a
> year ago, but I just can't remember what it was!
BTW, the purpose of the exercise is to identify possible candid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
So there I was, shopping around for reliable datagram protocols when
BAM! I run straight into RUDP. "Designed at Bell Labs for the Plan 9
operating system". I just skimmed through the (expired) IETF draft from
1999 and I honestly think the des
18 matches
Mail list logo