> The problem is that throughput and responsiveness are enemies.
no. not throughput, but buffer sizes are the enemy of latency
> you're trying to push a large quantity of data down a TCP connection,
> and try to do anything interactive over that same connection, the
> latency will make that
"Ethan Gardener" writes:
> What's the advantage over fcp(1)? 9p can have numerous requests "in
> flight" at once to work around latency issues, but of all the user
> programs, fcp is probably the only one which takes advantage of this.
The problem is that throughput and responsiveness are
Do you know if there has ever been a comprehensive evaluation of tuning
parameters for 9P? I am sure from my previous post that it is obvious I am on
the newer side of Plan9 users.
I feel like part of it could be a configuration issue, that is to say
specifying the gbe vs ether data type and
