Well I had a go at this on my RPi. I altered libc.a to arrange that errstr()
removes the error string filename decoration, but print ("%r") doesn't, and
wrapped the open() call (as an example) to do its own error string decoration
and hand that back to the kernel.
Unfortunately I then looked
Responses in-line.
On 2/23/24 06:12, Alyssa M via 9fans wrote:
> (Lucio posted while I've been thinking/composing/trying things...)
>
> Thanks for putting up with me!
No, thank you for your thoughts and helping test.
>
> I confess I've been thinking about this a bit more, as something about
(Lucio posted while I've been thinking/composing/trying things...)
Thanks for putting up with me!
I confess I've been thinking about this a bit more, as something about this
doesn't feel right:
As I understand it, the kernel is getting an error string from some file
server, and is decorating
On 2/22/24, Alyssa M via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote:
> [ ... ]
> Perhaps I'm missing something obvious.
>
You're not: there is a very large grey area between English language
exceptionalism and internationalisation madness.
As a citizen in a country where eleven languages are declared
I apologize I had recalled incorrectly in my previous email on this topic.
We had intentions of fixing this issue with v9fs but only half of the work
was done. 9front changed that specific error in the kernel to suffix the
filename instead of prefix the filename to
A) be more consistent with
Well, my daughter has kindly given me a couple of her spare raspberry pis - a
pi4 and a pi5.
I've put 9front on the pi4, and have been having a look at it. I had to use the
Raspberry Pi Imager program this time. windd didn't work (she thinks this might
be a feature of the later Pis). There are
Mystery solved: the bug was in my Ropen code. I was not returning QTDIR in the
qid.type when opening the directory.
I'd hazard a guess that because Rwalk said it was a directory, but then Ropen
said it was a file, sysfile.c:read() in the Plan 9 kernel didn't call
unionread(), so only the first
> On Sunday, 4 February 2024, at 4:46 PM, moody wrote:
>> I would bet money on this being a bug in your walk code.
That seems entirely possible! Thanks for the pointer.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
Err sorry, I realize now my diagnoses of what devmnt is doing is likely not
entirely correct, but I would bet money on this being a bug in your walk code.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
The issue with exportfs and linux v9fs has been fixed in 9front commit
6eed7a47863553bab31c7f9b1b5b314989efc640. It is regrettable that we had to
shift around the err string to make linux happy, but I have no interest in
getting involved with changing it on the linux side.
That issue with bind
10 matches
Mail list logo
