I think abaco should be made to host its own webcookies/webfs. Why
not?
I think this is a bad idea, what if you want to use an alternate
webfs (on a different NIC), or an non-standard cookies file? do you
want to wait whilst webcookies rescans it databse at startup and
webfs rescans its
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:36 AM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is a bad idea, what if you want to use an alternate
webfs (on a different NIC), or an non-standard cookies file? do you
want to wait whilst webcookies rescans it databse at startup and
webfs rescans
have you sent your patches to fgb?
iru
i think so. but it's been a very long time.
here's the entire patch to urls.c some fixups
may be required due to this fact. attached
is the whole patch to urls.c.
- erik
// tired of typing http://, tired of going to google first.
void
Here's another thing I'd like to see: preview on-disk pages:
abaco $home/x.html
that's not abaco -- that's webfs. webfs doesn't know what to do with file://.
- erik
#!/bin/sh
if [ ! -f $HOME/.webcookies ]; then
touch $HOME/.webcookies
fi
if [ ! -e `namespace`/web ]; then
webfs -s web
fi
# export PLAN9=/usr/share/abaco
abaco.bin $*
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* VinÃcius de Figueiredo Silva [EMAIL
11, 2008, at 6:29 PM, philo wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [9fans] abaco @ plan9port [WAS: Hi and, plan9-native abaco
sources?]
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:01:05 +0100
* VinÃcius de
