perhaps high-efficiency wall warts could make up much of the difference.
picked at random (first link) ...
http://www.amazon.com/Nokia-AC-10U-Micro-USB-Efficiency-Charger/dp/B00DP0TQLG
Given that the rpi has some weird power issues and without
specification of the amperage of the charger
On Fri Jul 18 12:51:49 EDT 2014, 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
perhaps high-efficiency wall warts could make up much of the difference.
picked at random (first link) ...
http://www.amazon.com/Nokia-AC-10U-Micro-USB-Efficiency-Charger/dp/B00DP0TQLG
Given that the rpi has some weird power
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:36:09 EDT erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
On Fri Jul 18 12:51:49 EDT 2014, 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
perhaps high-efficiency wall warts could make up much of the difference.
picked at random (first link) ...
I've used ReadyNAS appliances at home for almost 10 years. The current
product line is made up of low-power Atoms. I'm running a RAID5 across
4 500G enterprise SATA drives (that should indicate how old this unit
is pretty well...) I have a wired network primarily in the rack in the
office at
My desire is to have one file server with auth server and any
numbers of terminals which can also be used as cpu server
(for drawterm).
In this case the smallest config is a file server and a terminal/cpu
server.
Ken's file server is standallone and has special user space.
Then can we add
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Steven Stallion sstall...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
vu3...@gmail.com wrote:
I am very interested to use such a setup. Could you please add more
about the setup? What hardware do you use for the NAS? Any scripts
On Jul 17, 2014, at 9:56 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
i would think the same approach would work with fossil. of course one
would need a more sophisticated solution than just wait forever, due to
the tcp connection.
There is no particular reason for it to be tcp given
There is no particular reason for it to be tcp given lack of any
authentication. The beauty of CAS is that it need not even talk to the same
server
but it is! even when venti and fossil are on the same machine.
- erik
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:14:01 PDT Bakul Shah ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 2014, at 9:56 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
i would think the same approach would work with fossil. of course one
would need a more sophisticated solution than just wait forever, due to
So long as a server returns a block corresponding to its SHA1
score, you (the client) don't care whether it is the same
server you wrote the original block to or another (and you can
always verify the returned block). This opens up some
but this isn't unique to content-addressed storage. as
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:10:34 EDT erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
So long as a server returns a block corresponding to its SHA1
score, you (the client) don't care whether it is the same
server you wrote the original block to or another (and you can
always verify the returned
That was in an office environment. At home I use
fossil+(plan9port)venti running on linux-based NAS. This ends up
working very well for me since I have resources to spare on that
machine. This also lets me backup my arenas via CrashPlan. I use a
I am very interested to use such a setup.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:04 PM, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
not a fair comparsion.
Yes, I'd have been more specific.
my intension was cwfs fossil+venti of 9atom fossil+venti labs.
I did not consider kenfs itself, because I consider it should be
file+auth+cpu server. The last is
Recent kenfs can be such a machine?
Please remember I plan it for my private home machine, not
any sofisticated office use.
i use ken's file server for personal use. i enjoy the
fact that a cpu kernel panic does not impact the file server.
- erik
On Wed Jul 16 13:06:16 EDT 2014, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
kenfs(of course 64 bit)+auth server +++9pi terminal/cpu server
may be best for home use...
i would go ahead and use to raspberry pi machines. having a dedicated
cpu server is quite nice, and of course ken's file server is not an
kenfs works well, but you have to be well prepared to maintain it.
Invest in a decent UPS - preferably one that is supported by the
auto-shutdown (ISTR support was added for that a while back). You need
to be careful when sizing your cache - I would invest in a pair of
decent SSDs for cache,
i use ken's file server for personal use. i enjoy the
fact that a cpu kernel panic does not impact the file server.
My desire is to have one file server with auth server and any
numbers of terminals which can also be used as cpu server
(for drawterm).
In this case the smallest config is a
That was in an office environment. At home I use
fossil+(plan9port)venti running on linux-based NAS.
Do you use wireless LAN?
If so you also need wireless bridge?
The combination of NAS and venti sounds like charm,
because the snmallest config is two machines.
How about the power-eating of
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:15 PM, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
That was in an office environment. At home I use
fossil+(plan9port)venti running on linux-based NAS.
Do you use wireless LAN?
If so you also need wireless bridge?
The combination of NAS and venti sounds like charm,
because
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:29:43 CDT Steven Stallion sstall...@gmail.com wrote:
I absolutely would not use wireless to connect fossil
to venti (fossil does *not* cope well with the connection to venti
dropping).
To deal with this you can use a local venti proxy like
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
vu3...@gmail.com wrote:
I am very interested to use such a setup. Could you please add more
about the setup? What hardware do you use for the NAS? Any scripts
etc?
Sure thing - I've copied everything you should need under
Sorry, found it now.
On 07/17/2014 07:31 AM, Steven Stallion wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Steven Stallion sstall...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:15 PM, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
It just so happens I wrote a README at the time since it was
non-obvious how to
Not Found
The resource could not be found.
WSGI Server
On 07/17/2014 07:29 AM, Steven Stallion wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:15 PM, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
That was in an office environment. At home I use
fossil+(plan9port)venti running on linux-based NAS.
Do you use wireless
I've experienced three kinds of Plan9 file servers,
Lab's one, 9atom and plan9front.
I felt that the file server speed is 9front 9atom lab's.
This is based on verious different machines for each.
Is my feeling wrong, or hasve some base facts?
This is to prepare the fastest file server on
a
On Jul 15, 2014, at 2:13 , kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
I've experienced three kinds of Plan9 file servers,
Lab's one, 9atom and plan9front.
Can you clarify which file server, specifically, you're comparing for each of
these? The Labs doesn't distribute kenfs any more, and venti+fossil is
not a fair comparsion.
i'd look into kenfs for a fileserver only machine. might
require some time to get it to work with your hardware tho.
--
cinap
On Tue Jul 15 12:31:57 EDT 2014, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
not a fair comparsion.
i'd look into kenfs for a fileserver only machine. might
require some time to get it to work with your hardware tho.
if you have a recent 64-bit intel machine, the hardware support
should be nearly the
not a fair comparsion.
Yes, I'd have been more specific.
my intension was cwfs fossil+venti of 9atom fossil+venti labs.
I did not consider kenfs itself, because I consider it should be
file+auth+cpu server. The last is not important, but for drawterm
from others.
Recent kenfs can be such a
kenfs(of course 64 bit)+auth server +++9pi terminal/cpu server
may be best for home use...
Kenji
29 matches
Mail list logo
