> Nils Holm's Scheme interpreter @ http://t3x.org/s9fes has
> been available for a few months now. It runs on plan9 though
> not on inferno.
For Inferno, look at:
http://code.google.com/p/inferno-scheme
It's best considered embryonic, and has been that way
for a little while as I've been side-
Gambit is really great. Runs on "bare metal" on the Nintendo DS (with a bit
of work).
There is a distribtued programming extension for
Gambit called "Termite" that uses the same approach as Erlang as well.
Very neat stuff :-). I nearly used Gambit at work on an embedded
platform, but had some di
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:42 PM, John Floren wrote:
> TinyScheme has been in contrib for a long time, but I don't know its
> limitations or how it would stack up against 'ChibiScheme'
>
> John
Alex (the article's author) mentions it at
http://groups.google.com/group/plan9-gsoc/browse_thread/thread
TinyScheme has been in contrib for a long time, but I don't know its
limitations or how it would stack up against 'ChibiScheme'
John
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:53 AM, David Leimbach wrote:
> COOL! So there's a Scheme in the works for Inferno and Plan 9?
> Dave
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:50 AM,
Nils Holm's Scheme interpreter @ http://t3x.org/s9fes has
been available for a few months now. It runs on plan9 though
not on inferno. Like Chibi-scheme it too is fairly small.
(about 5.5Klocs of C, 1.4Klock of Scheme).
I am more interested in Gambit as it is one of the fastest
Scheme implementa
COOL! So there's a Scheme in the works for Inferno and Plan 9?
Dave
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> 2009/6/25 andrey mirtchovski :
> > Mentions Plan 9 just at the end in the context of C compilers,
> > although the argument of the article, that being able to "do more wi
2009/6/25 andrey mirtchovski :
> Mentions Plan 9 just at the end in the context of C compilers,
> although the argument of the article, that being able to "do more with
> less" is better, is applicable to Plan 9 in the OS field too.
>
> http://synthcode.com/blog/2009/06/Small_is_Beautiful
>
> I'm s
Mentions Plan 9 just at the end in the context of C compilers,
although the argument of the article, that being able to "do more with
less" is better, is applicable to Plan 9 in the OS field too.
http://synthcode.com/blog/2009/06/Small_is_Beautiful
I'm sorry if this got posted earlier and I misse