* Ashwin Ganti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The device driver is in:http://gsoc.cat-v.org/hg/lincapdevice/
The authentication server port is in:
http://gsoc.cat-v.org/hg/p9pauthsrv/
Great, I'll have a look at it :)
My decision for the *uid files (instead of cap devices) was because:
a) more
Hi folks,
is anyone already working on an factotum port to p9p or native Linux ?
I've just wrote a patch to Linux kernel which allows changing
another process' privileges (uid, etc). The /dev/caphash and
/dev/capuse devices (IMHO) can be simulated from userspace.
cu
--
is anyone already working on an factotum port to p9p or native Linux ?
P9P already has factotum.
BLS
// is anyone already working on an factotum port to p9p or native Linux ?
wait, what?
: sh;ls -l /9/bin/factotum
-rwxr-xr-x 1 anthony admin 312148 Mar 1 13:23 /9/bin/factotum
// I've just wrote a patch to Linux kernel which allows changing
// another process' privileges (uid, etc).
is
Any particular (security?) reason for not having a PAM-aware factotum
or is it just lack of interest?
if i understand p9p correctly, it's object is to get along with
the system, not replace bits of it.