2009/6/12 Venkatesh Srinivas m...@acm.jhu.edu:
Adrian, how recent is you p9p checkout?
A daily update from the mercurial repository. Perhaps I should be a
little less bleeding edge...
Also, could you set 'verbose' to 1 in plan9port/src/cmd/venti/copy.c,
rebuild, and try to copy this score to
Inside plan9port/src/cmd/venti/srv/lump.c, in readlump(), could you
check that the score being read is a sane one? (not the zero-score)
Just printing it out for now would be enough.
Thanks,
-- vs
% unvac -t vac:8ab4746b0fb06da481158624afb7509cefc35e07
unvac: vacfsopen: read too small 1: asked for 0 need at least 300
% venti/copy 'tcp!localhost!17034' 'tcp!localhost!17034'
vac:8ab4746b0fb06da481158624afb7509cefc35e07
venti/copy: reading block
On Jun 11, 2009, at 23:34, Venkatesh Srinivas m...@acm.jhu.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:00 PM, J.R. Maurojrm8...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't help with this in particular, but QEMU does some really
low-level hackery to the point where it wouldn't compile with GCC 4,
so it's possible
I can't help with this in particular, but QEMU does some really
low-level hackery to the point where it wouldn't compile with GCC 4,
so it's possible something like that is going on here.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Adrian Tritschlera...@ajft.org wrote:
I've got a p9p venti running on two
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:00 PM, J.R. Maurojrm8...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't help with this in particular, but QEMU does some really
low-level hackery to the point where it wouldn't compile with GCC 4,
so it's possible something like that is going on here.
Thankfully, this is no longer true.
