On 10/29/18, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> It's z because the Atmel AVR is the last thing you'd want to use. (As
> usual, once you've got C going, it's ok, except for the design bugs.)
Sadly, some of the Atmel kit I'd like to play with is no longer
supported, the CPUs are nowhere to be sourced from
I think I have sources for the z[acl] suite somewhere. You make it
sound like maybe I should give them back to Charles :-).
Lucio.
On 10/28/18, Steve Simon wrote:
> hi,
>
> also maybe of interest, charles ported the plan9 c compiler to the atmel
> at32mega. i asked him for a copy but sadly the
AVR, and if I were to weigh in I'd say that its presence in Inferno
may justify you changing your choice. I guess Charles did precisely as
you did, he probably ought to rename too, so that "z" can be kept as
interim for the next architecture :-).
Lucio.
On 10/29/18, Richard Miller
> I think I have sources for the z[acl] suite somewhere. You make it
> sound like maybe I should give them back to Charles
>
What architecture is that for? I picked 'z' for riscv hoping there wasn't
a collision, but I can change it.
It's z because the Atmel AVR is the last thing you'd want to use. (As
usual, once you've got C going, it's ok, except for the design bugs.)
They were in the Berkeley mote, which we worked on years ago, later on
custom hardware, but always with completely different software from
Berkeley's.
I had
