Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-12-04 Thread Richard Miller
> I haven't seen this particular redraw artifact, but I've seen other > smaller ones. Is there anything in particular that you can do to > reproduce it? It turns out that there is: 1 acme -f $font /acme/mail/guide; guide opens at top of right column 2 left-click on Mail; mbox list opens in right

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-12-04 Thread ori
> On the tangential subject of acme mail, I have a very infrequent bug > where the header of a newly arrived message pops up in the position > where the /mail/fs/mbox window used to be, some time after the mbox > window has been adjusted by another window opening. Does anyone else > see this? Is

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-12-03 Thread Anthony Martin
o...@eigenstate.org once said: > Unrelatedly, would there be interest in adding the `$split{cmd} syntax > from 9atom to 9legacy? I think it's currently the only reason that > git9 doesn't work out of the box there, and it's very nice syntax. I'm not a fan of the `word{...} syntax. It's odd to

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-12-03 Thread Richard Miller
On the tangential subject of acme mail, I have a very infrequent bug where the header of a newly arrived message pops up in the position where the /mail/fs/mbox window used to be, some time after the mbox window has been adjusted by another window opening. Does anyone else see this? Is there a

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-12-02 Thread ori
> Looks like that was it - thanks a lot David! IMAP is syncing as we > speak. It looks like I have my work cut out for me to get things > updated to 9legacy's latest and greatest. > > Cheers, > Steve I've put some patches together that made acme Mail a bunch more usable for me. Mostly around

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-11-28 Thread Steven Stallion
Looks like that was it - thanks a lot David! IMAP is syncing as we speak. It looks like I have my work cut out for me to get things updated to 9legacy's latest and greatest. Cheers, Steve On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 1:00 PM David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If the server uses a X.509

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-11-28 Thread David du Colombier
If the server uses a X.509 certificate with a SHA256 signature, you need SHA2 signature support in libsec. http://9legacy.org/9legacy/patch/libsec-x509-sha2.diff http://9legacy.org/9legacy/patch/libsec-x509-sig.diff -- David du Colombier -- 9fans: 9fans

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-11-28 Thread kvik
> unfortunately it doesn't look like anything is being logged Turns out I misremembered where upas/fs logs the failure: ; upas/fs -f /imaps/imap.gmail.com/$gmail upas/fs: opening /imaps/imap.gmail.com/$gmail: imap.gmail.com/imaps:cert for imap.gmail.com not recognized:

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-11-28 Thread Steven Stallion
Thanks - unfortunately it doesn't look like anything is being logged. Interestingly enough, it looks like mail has been broken for quite a while, this was the last log message recorded (the fileserver went into storage in mid 2018): gunge Aug 26 05:25:04 delivered stallion From stallion Wed Aug

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-11-28 Thread kvik
Check /sys/log/mail for a fingerprint. -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Te20476748ab5e4ba-M519efe14ca0b3cb7c3836dee Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-11-28 Thread kvik
Adding the fingerprint will work if you are lucky, once, or maybe twice. In my experience almost every new connection required redoing the above -- which wasn't very fun so I ended up forwarding gmail into a sub-mailbox under my control and haven't looked back. Working with their SMTP has the

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-11-28 Thread Steven Stallion
Thanks guys. I suspect I'm about to regret my lack of time mucking about with tls on plan9: % upas/fs -f /imaps/imap.gmail.com/sstall...@gmail.com upas/fs: opening /imaps/imap.gmail.com/sstall...@gmail.com: imap.gmail.com/imaps:tlsClient: tls: local invalid x509/rsa certificate % cat

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-11-28 Thread David du Colombier
The TLS implementation on Plan 9 doesn't verify X.509 certificate chain, so the certificate bundle isn't useful. It's only used by Go programs. However, you need to add the server certificate fingerprint to /sys/lib/tls/mail, as Steve Simon said. -- David du Colombier

Re: [9fans] Gmail vs upas

2019-11-28 Thread Steve Simon
hi, i receive mail on plan9 so i dont use gmail. you sure you didn't forget to install a new x509 thumbprint in /sys/lib/tls/mail? -Steve On 28 Nov 2019, at 3:40 pm, Steven Stallion wrote: > > All, > > Is anyone still fetching Gmail these days? After bringing my old > fileserver back