Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-16 Thread Laura Conrad
> "John" == John Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> My conclusion is that there's no standard for this among printers, at John> least in the British Isles and North America. The best advice for John> anyone implementing an ABC player would be to expect all of these,

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-16 Thread John Chambers
Jack Campin writes: | >> A somewhat trickier problem is that there's currently a fair amount | >> of abc tunes that don't even use the initial repeat on second and | >> later sections. Some users seems to think that :| is a fine way to | >> start a repeated section. | > This is also wh

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-16 Thread Phil Taylor
Jack Campin wrote: >Version 3 *should* produce an error warning, as there is an empty bar >between lines 3 and 4; this is no different from writing the first two >lines as > > A>ee e>fg|e>dB d>BG|A>ee e>fg|e>dB A3 | > |a>aa g>ag|f>gf e>AA|A>ee e>fg|e>dB A3:| > >which BarFly correctly flags as an

Re: [abcusers] Initial repeats

2001-12-16 Thread Bryancreer
Jack Campin says - >repeat signs are bars, I don't think so.  At a quick glance, seven out of the first twelve tunes in the Northumbrian Piper's Tune Book have repeat symbols that don't coincide with bars. >Also, if you want to reorganize the line breaks, you have to edit the >adjacent :| and |:

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-16 Thread Jack Campin
>> A somewhat trickier problem is that there's currently a fair amount >> of abc tunes that don't even use the initial repeat on second and >> later sections. Some users seems to think that :| is a fine way to >> start a repeated section. > This is also what many printed sources do, e.

[abcusers] Change of address

2001-12-16 Thread Sean Corcoran
Please note my change of email address. It is now [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages sent to the old address after Thurs. Dec. 13 will not have been received. Thank You.