Re: [abcusers] Initial repeats

2001-12-17 Thread Jack Campin
>>repeat signs are bars, > I don't think so.  At a quick glance, seven out of the first twelve > tunes in the Northumbrian Piper's Tune Book have repeat symbols that > don't coincide with bars. Okay, I guess both I and the 1.6 standard are wrong on that. > For instance, I want to be able to do

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-17 Thread Laurie Griffiths
Ah. I do apologise for maligning your software! L. - Original Message - From: Phil Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:27 PM Subject: Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats Laurie Griffiths wrote: >(I think there was (and may still be) a res

Re: [abcusers] Initial bar lines

2001-12-17 Thread Bryancreer
John Chambers said - >As I've noted before, we have a population of users who   >can't  even  be bothered  to  type  "X:1"  at  the start of their tunes. I've heard it said that if a door is clearly marked PULL but everyone who comes to it tries to PUSH, it is not because they are all stupid;

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-17 Thread Phil Taylor
Laurie Griffiths wrote: >(I think there was (and may still be) a restriction in Barfly that repeats >are only allowed at bar boundaries - but I also recall Phil admitting that >is a restriction in Barfly caused by a misunderstanding when he wrote it. No, repeats can go anywhere, and don't have t

[abcusers] Initial bar lines

2001-12-17 Thread John Chambers
John wrote: | On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, James Allwright wrote: | | > My point is that missing out a start repeat is bad notation; an | > anacrusis at the start of a piece generates ambiguity and I think you | > will be hard pressed to find a music textbook that legitimizes the | > process of missing of

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-17 Thread jhoerr
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, James Allwright wrote: > My point is that missing out a start repeat is bad notation; an > anacrusis at the start of a piece generates ambiguity and I think you > will be hard pressed to find a music textbook that legitimizes the > process of missing off start repeats. >From

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-17 Thread Laurie Griffiths
I beg to differ. (Incidentally Scarce Of Tatties is a jig that I rather like - it's in Sue Songer's Portland Collection). Version 1 - stripped to the bone X:1 K:A Mix A>ee e>fg|e>dB A3:| a>ea a2e |e>dB A3:| is incorrect ABC but can be fixed up by guessing (YES, GUESSING!!) where the two repeats

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-17 Thread James Allwright
Someone incorrectly writes: > > : James is adamant that abc2midi won't play a repeat unless there's > : a balanced begin/end. > Damn! Take a day off work and someone decides to put nonsense words in your mouth! Just for the record, abc2midi does have code in there to guess the start of repeats