Jack Campin wrote:
I'd like to catch the use the the Y: field for future extensions
like Y:someinfofield=some info field value
This way we've maintained compitiblity with existing abc files
while having the possibilty of future expansion.
Perhaps Phil (as the person whose program has the
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 11:00:11AM +0100, Phil Taylor wrote:
Jack Campin wrote:
I'd like to catch the use the the Y: field for future extensions
like Y:someinfofield=some info field value
This way we've maintained compitiblity with existing abc files
while having the possibilty of
Changing abcm2ps to use *...* instead of !...! (it accepts ! for
a
linebreak already) would be a matter of minutes work for Jef.
Changing ABC2Win
is not possible.
no, we don't ask people to change their way of notation or Abc2Win
to be improved or conform to anything : !-for-line-break addicts
Arent Storm writes:
| From: I. Oppenheim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| T1 in V:T1 is just an identifier that will make the ABC
| source code more readable.
|
| As you know the name of the voice and other options
| need to be spelled out only once, so having readable
| identifiers throughout a big
- Original Message -
From: John Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: [abcusers] voice properties
Arent Storm writes:
| From: I. Oppenheim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| T1 in V:T1 is just an identifier that will make the ABC
|
Arent Storm wrote:
Nonetheless
V:1 name=Soprano subname=S
V:2 name=Alto subname=A
V:3 name=Tenor subname=T clef=tenor
V:4 name=Bass subname=B clef=bass
would be more complete and to the point
I agree. BarFly currently does not use voice labels at all, and
only permits numerical V: fields.
I'm catching up on old email here.
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:41:01 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Taylor)
Bernard Hill wrote:
Why is it so great? What's wrong with z8 (or z6 or whatever is
appropriate)?
Presumably because you can write | Z5 | and have the program interpret
it as
