Re: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-15 Thread Neil Jennings
I wasn't for when YOU dropped them so much as when the computer ops dropped them (and didn't tell you). Particularly BEFORE the run! That was why we put big diagonal lines in felt pen across the tops. That 72 is especially bizarre. How many people these days could even tell you where that st

Re: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-15 Thread Christian M. Cepel
John Chambers wrote: Christian M. Cepel writes: | John Chambers wrote: | | >Since ABC is widely used to send tunes via email, ABC ends up being | >embedded inside messages in lots of other formats. It's fairly common | >for this to garble the ABC, as the encoding software is usually | >debu

RE: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-15 Thread Richard Walker
I used the columns after 72 for sequence numbers so I could use the sorter to put a deck of cards back in order if (when) I dropped them. Up to 72, I used for FORTRAN code. lol ... and on a good day I could get two or three runs at the school computer. To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your bro

Re: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-15 Thread John Chambers
Christian M. Cepel writes: | John Chambers wrote: | | >Since ABC is widely used to send tunes via email, ABC ends up being | >embedded inside messages in lots of other formats. It's fairly common | >for this to garble the ABC, as the encoding software is usually | >debugged only with ord

Re: [abcusers] On parsers again - Outlook & PHP

2004-08-15 Thread Christian M. Cepel
John Chambers wrote: Since ABC is widely used to send tunes via email, ABC ends up being embedded inside messages in lots of other formats. It's fairly common for this to garble the ABC, as the encoding software is usually debugged only with ordinary (English) text. Decoding is fairl