;D7"FA/c/ "G"B.GG2:|
> |:"G"gf/e/ .d.c B.cd2|"G"gf/e/ .d.c "D7"B.cA2|\
> "G"gf/e/ .d.c B.c d3/B/|"C"c/B/A/G/ "D7"FA/c/ "G"B.GG2:|
Since I get the digest I hesitate to respond in case 20 others already have,
but just in case, it's the Rakes of Mallow - great tune!
Peter Yarensky
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
I haven't seen anything about it since the notice that Chris Walshaw's abc
home page had disappeared, which I verified for myself. However, I was just
at John Chambers' abc site and clicked on the link for Chris Walshaw's
web-wide abc index to see what would happen. I was taken right to it, and
alo
Jack Campin wrote:
> If you can't make your ABC source human-readable you shouldn't
> be using it. If all you want is staff notation, Finale or
> Sibelius will do it better. It's the other uses of ABC that
> make it unique, and most of those uses depend on readability.
As a user of abc I have t
Guido Gonzato said,
> And about those broken old ABC files, I remind
> you that abcpp can fix most of them!
and
> using abcpp I've fixed lots of legacy ABC files. It would be nice if there
> were a web-based "translation service" based on abcpp. I have no
> experience on writing web applets; any
Jon Freeman wrote,
> I think you are taking a pretty narrow view here. Yes, abcm2ps is excellent
> but it is pretty well useless to many people I know who may like to use abc.
> What you see in the abcusers list tends to be the "geeks", the ones that are
> quite happy to run command line programs,