On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:18:22 +, Luis Pablo Gasparotto
> >Ok! But let me ask you something: When was this setted to 16? What was
> >the speed of the top machines then?
>
Speed is of very little importance to use abcm2ps. Even my old Atari
runs
>> Ok! But let me ask you something: When was this setted to 16?
>> What was the speed of the top machines then?
> The older abcm2ps I have, version 0.12.9, in date March 28, 1999,
> already had a max of 16 staves. The speed at this time was the same
> as now: I develop on a PC 486 DX 100 with 32 M
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:18:22 +, Luis Pablo Gasparotto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ok! But let me ask you something: When was this setted to 16? What was
>the speed of the top machines then?
The older abcm2ps I have, version 0.12.9, in date March 28, 1999,
already had a max of 16 staves. The s
Ok! But let me ask you something: When was this setted to 16? What was
the speed of the top machines then?
Regards,
Luis Pablo
I. Oppenheim wrote:
>On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Luis Pablo Gasparotto wrote:
>
>>Is there some reason to limit the number of staffs to 16 in abc2ps.h?
>>
>
>No other than that
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Luis Pablo Gasparotto wrote:
> Is there some reason to limit the number of staffs to 16 in abc2ps.h?
No other than that it costs more memory to deal with
more staves, so it's reasonable to set the default not
too high.
Groeten,
Irwin Oppenheim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~*
C
Hi folks,
Is there some reason to limit the number of staffs to 16 in abc2ps.h?
I'm working on the masters of the symphonic band on wich I play alto
saxophone and usually I need more than 16 voices. Anyway, I've changed
MAXSTAFF to 24 and I've recompiled abcm2ps.
I suggest to the people who de
