Toni Schilling wrote:
>
> Don't you think it's time to change the subject-line of this thread?
Definitely not!
Discussions at abcusers always turn out this way, and finally we have
found a subject-line that covers all bases! ;-)
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullo
On 25 Oct 02 3:08 pm, John Chambers wrote:
> Of course, as with the plain-text vs word-processor debate, ABC lacks
> most of the fancy music formatting of some other packages.
Once upon a time, the orchestra was given the tune & perhaps an
indication of the bass line together with some general com
RJP wrote:
| On 24 Oct 02 5:16 pm, John Chambers wrote:
| > Maybe some day we'll all have full music software on our pocket comm
| > gadgets.
| A tin whistle / Harmonica in the pocket is easier... (apart from the fluff)
At musical events, I often have a whistle or three tucked into a
belt.
On 24 Oct 02 5:16 pm, John Chambers wrote:
> hand-written, human readable music notation that didn't even require
> a computer, much less any specialized software. There are quite a lot
> of abc users who still use it this way. I've suggested this to a
> number of people who asked me how
Don't you think it's time to change the subject-line of this thread?
Toni
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
At 04:35 PM 10/24/2002 +0100, you wrote:
But a preposition is not a word to end a sentence with.
Reminds me of a joke I heard recently:
Man from Alabama: So, mister, where are you from?
Man from Boston: Somewhere where we do not end a sentence with a preposition.
Man from Alabama: OK, where
Thanks to Aaron and Frank for their input; I used both. Aaron's tune,
while only a few keystrokes away from being perfectly acceptable ABC,
wasn't quite the way I remembered the tune as being structured, but
having it that way made it far quicker to get it the way I wanted from
those MIDIs.
I had
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Please try tunes on your abc player before posting them. Nobody
> > wants to post or read abc that doesn't work
>
>
> Better yet I'll just stop posting.
>
Please don't stop posting. Many of us lurker types are perfectly
delighted by people who have the gumptio
> Please try tunes on your abc player before posting them. Nobody
> wants to post or read abc that doesn't work
Better yet I'll just stop posting.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Please try tunes on your abc player before posting them. Nobody
> wants to post or read abc that doesn't work.
Good point, David, but is that really the right way to greet a new contributor?
I know you only wanted to offer some helpful advice, but it ended up
lookin
> Curious. Did these work in the abc software you put them
> together in? (How's that for a split infinitive?)
Actually that is not a split infinitive. You don't need to really bother
about them though. Some authorities on English (e.g. Fowler) say that
people make fools of themselves trying to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Here are 3 different versions...
Curious. Did these work in the abc software you put them together
in? (How's that for a split infinitive?) They have no K: fields
(K:C works fine) and are full of blank lines that effectively end
each tune at the headers (and several oth
12 matches
Mail list logo
