John Chambers wrote:
Atte wrote:
| On Fri, 24 May 2002, Jack Campin wrote:
| The point of ABC is to notate music, not music notation.
|
| Sorry, to interrupt, but why did you propose the i and j modifiers then?
Hey, i was my suggestion; Jack only gets credit/blame for j. ;-)
|
Frank Evil Grin Nordberg challenged Can anybody come up with a clear and
consise definition (in twenty words
or less) of the difference between musically relevant and purely notational
features?
A difference between two pieces of notation is musically relevant if and
only if it means they should
Laurie wrote:
Frank Evil Grin Nordberg challenged Can anybody come up with a clear and
consise definition (in twenty words
or less) of the difference between musically relevant and purely notational
features?
A difference between two pieces of notation is musically relevant if and
only if it
Laurie (ukonline) wrote:
A difference between two pieces of notation is musically relevant if and
only if it means they should sound different.
(20 words)
Nice one, Laurie :-)
Except, I think it ought to be will sound different rather than
should sound different, that is, what matters in
From: Laurie (ukonline) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 17:34:58 +0100
Thus writing in a different key and inserting accidentals to correct is not
musically relevant.
I disagree. Writing __B instead of A, for instance, gives an indication
of the chord or chord progression that the
