Wil Macaulay wrote:
Yes, I do have a suggestion: if you really want to implement a
'generic parser', start by choosing a standard to implement. If you
want to suggest changes to the standard, do so as an independent
process. Otherwise you'll end up with a parser that only parses
non-standard
Yes, I do have a suggestion: if you really want to implement a 'generic
parser', start by choosing a standard to implement. If you want to
suggest changes to the standard, do so as an independent process.
Otherwise you'll end up with a parser that only parses non-standard abc...
having said
Neil Jennings wrote:
I still think my suggestion is more general, as it allows the internal
part name (one letter) to be totally independent of the displayed text
(Part description).
Remo's proposal would only allow one word (part name) to start with
each letter. Therefore if there was a part
My program would reject (ignore) any part specification longer than one
letter.
Your proposal could lead to ambiguous part specifications, if one name
matched part of another name.
I can see the need for the part specification to have two 'parts', one
the single letter identifier to be used in
Neil Jennings wrote (about Remo proposal):
My program would reject (ignore) any part specification longer than
one letter.
Your proposal could lead to ambiguous part specifications, if one name
matched part of another name.
Remo proposal (below) avoids ambiguity by distinguishing between
Em 25 Oct 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
My program would reject (ignore) any part specification longer than one
letter.
Your proposal could lead to ambiguous part specifications, if one name
matched part of another name.
Remo's proposal avoids the ambiguity by distinguishing the
Because the P: text appears above the staff, people have mis-used it to add
comments which have nothing to do with parts.
In the tune header, it can have a formula such as (AB)2(AC)3
In the body, it must be just a single letter
HARMONY can play tunes according to the formula, including nested
Neil Jennings wrote:
Because the P: text appears above the staff, people have mis-used it to add
comments which have nothing to do with parts.
In the tune header, it can have a formula such as (AB)2(AC)3
In the body, it must be just a single letter
HARMONY can play tunes according to the formula,
