On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 19:32 +, V Stuart Foote wrote:
> Exactly! But since there are continuing issues with the UNO
> Accessibility API, taking time no for reworking it (fixing short falls
> for NSAccessibility and AT/ATK) while conceiving and implementing a
> replacement Windows bridge (not us
From: Christophe Strobbe [mailto:stro...@hdm-stuttgart.de]
>Am Do, 6.12.2012, 19:18 schrieb V Stuart Foote:
>> Unfortunately, the winaccessibility IAccessible2 implementation of the
>> IBM Symphony contribution (or the rest of Symphony base line) did not
>> get picked up for inclusion in the cu
Hi,
(My comments are inline.)
Am Do, 6.12.2012, 19:18 schrieb V Stuart Foote:
> (...)
>
>
> Unfortunately, the winaccessibility IAccessible2 implementation of the IBM
> Symphony contribution (or the rest of Symphony base line) did not get
> picked up for inclusion in the current development effor
Tom,
Hi. Haven't gone anywhere. Just not much to correspond about. I've been
lurking over on Apache OpenOffice lists which are struggling to bring together
devs, qa and infrastructure with their "graduation".
Unfortunately, the winaccessibility IAccessible2 implementation of the IBM
Symphony
