Hi. It looks like we need a new relation to expose aria-errormessage which
refers to an element containing the error message. Should we have a pair
IA2_RELATION_ERROR_FOR/BY for that?
THanks!
Alexander.
[1] https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#aria-errormessage
On 08/11/2015 01:16 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
Sure, but then you need to separate out descriptions from error
messages, including text extraction for descriptions. We would have to
do this for descriptions and error messages.
At least in ATK/AT-SPI2, to get any relation, you have to get
Sure, but then you need to separate out descriptions from error messages,
including text extraction for descriptions. We would have to do this for
descriptions and error messages.
Which evil do people prefer?
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: Joanmarie Diggs jdi...@igalia.com
To: Richard
Do we really need a dedicated relationship for this? Because the
target of an AtkRelation is an array of objects, I would think we
could use an existing relationship (e.g. described-by/description-for).
Then we could examine the target object(s) to see if it's the one
defined by aria-errormessage