On 2/03/2016 12:13 AM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
If you really do want errormessage to be treated as an entirely
separate thing, then I have to change my position on this: we need a
new relation and new events.
Really? Why can't we map it via described-by/description-for and then
use an object
Hey Jamie.
On 02/24/2016 06:14 PM, James Teh wrote:
> If you really do want errormessage to be treated as an entirely
> separate thing, then I have to change my position on this: we need a
> new relation and new events.
Really? Why can't we map it via described-by/description-for and then
use
