Very much true sir.
Mittal
-Original Message-
From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf
Of P. Subramani
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2016 1:14 PM
To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issuesconcerning
thedisabled.
Subject: Re: [AI]My
There may be objections from one or the other quarter with the terms used to
denote a person with disabilities.
We are wasting our skills in criticising the term divyang.
We should rather try to present an alternative which is the least objectionable
and the most acceptable.
The term Viklang,
this time, you put the correct sportlight
E-Mail: subramani6...@gmail.com
Mob: 9738150192
Facebook: facebook.com/subu.subramani.16
- Original Message -
From: "avinash shahi"
To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues
concerningthe
I do respect your views and also the fight/campaign against the faulty rpd
bill, pm merely suggested a word which after wider consultations/discussions
could be accpted/rejected by the views of the disableds/activitists, etc.,
my concern is the posting give an impression that modi is
I kno that our Prime Minister is not a disability rights activist or a
disability scholar. And he is not well read about the correctness of
the disability terminology. What he suggested is a name hold by many
individuals in India. If one googles, one could find names Divyang
Chaudhary, Divyang
The problem as Rajesh put it, the words from the PM is an imposition. Govt
officials do not have the backbone to stand up and say that they disagree. If
the PM has said that PWDs are to be called Diviang then the Govt officials will
blindly follow (no pun intended). The PM is not a subject
How do we make it crystal clear that our fight is not with the Modi as
a person. However his suggestion of 'divyang' as the PM of a largely
uneducated country needs to be taken seriously. Why some of us always
think that the disability is apolitical subject. Its very much
political and we should
well avinash, we must fight with the govt to get these things done rather
than asking the govt as to why you haven't done all these. There is no
reason for suddenly taking a hardline against the after BJP coming to
power. Where were you people and others while the earlier govt was ruling?
Dear Friend,
we should focus on both the aspects because these terminologies
reflect a certain mindset which perpetuate exclusion. according to me,
what i want and what i want myself to be called is of paramount
importance.
sincerely, Anirban Mukherjee
On 12/29/15, Avichal Bhatnagar
Shal we start a petition on this?
Warm Regards,
Tilak.
On 12/29/15, Anirban Mukherjee wrote:
> Dear Friend,
>
> we should focus on both the aspects because these terminologies
> reflect a certain mindset which perpetuate exclusion. according to me,
> what i want and
Mr Modi is a man of words. However, as for the implementation, his record is
very poor. In Gujarat, he is responsible for preventing the entry of the VI
into the teachership in the primary school. So, please, do not get trapped
by his words. Sorry if my comment sounds political to you. However,
Oh, there it's kejriwal and not modi.
Don't hold center responsible, even if a dog barks in the states governed by
non-NDA, na?
-Original Message-
From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of
Rajesh H Mehta
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:29 AM
Change in terminology would cost the country big money too! Besides, it is not
about terms it is about mindset. If nomenclature could bring about change, life
would have not been such a struggle. It is about attitude! The term Deviang
has a patronising shade to it.
-Original
true,
The present government is long on sloganeering and short on actions.
I have come to expect some new slogan daily...
Smile.
Anyway, why couldn't they have excluded Divyangs while withdrawing LPG subsidy
from persons earning more than ten lakh rupees?!
-Original Message-
From:
For that matter even in currant alternative car arrangement of Delhi also
there is no leave for Divyangs.
From: "Asudani, Rajesh"
To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues
concerning the disabled."
Dear friends,
To those who prefer to sound holier than thou, let me say this: yes,
terminology does have relevance. It has relevance to the extent that
it is reflective of a certain mindset; it also has relevance and it
impacts and affects our distinct identity as a group.
Talking about
It is not just a spontaneous Man Ki Baat.All this is coming along with
the weakening of the prospects of a genuine and rights-based
disability legislation. It is indeed not just a matter of
terminologies, in the sense that the terminology itself is a part of
the worst that may be coming.
We can either focus only upon terminology, or think for the greater
good, the choice is purely ours.
On 12/29/15, akshun mahajan wrote:
> I disagree with you avinash over it because radioudaan were the first
> plateform who slammed government for this and we have
Isn't it interesting to see no reactions from the NGO sector on the
'divyang'. I guess we will have four 5 editorials in the days to come
in different national dalies. However why NGOs have not come up with
their stands is incomprehensible.
On 12/29/15, bala9119 wrote:
>
Although I could not have expressed like Anirban sir, he reverberated
what I had in me. however, let me express my usual, extreme version. I
am not afraid of the dam consequences.
"when there was Godse for Gandhi to provide sanety to India, there
will surely be someone for Modi to render justice."
If debating terminology is merrly an academic quest then the dignity
gets beating in the popular culture. If dalits had not objected to
'chamar' and other denigrating linguistic barbs they had not sceen the
day when the Constitution accorded them protection and recognition.
On 12/29/15,
I disagree with you avinash over it because radioudaan were the first
plateform who slammed government for this and we have even wrote to
Mr. Modi but yes our big NGOs are quite for that and when I ask them
they said and I quote terminology is not abig issue for us.
On 12/29/15, avinash shahi
As Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi terming dalits as ‘harijan’ sparked off
a political and intellectual fervent among the dalits decades ago,
similarly the Prime Minister Modi’s new invention ‘divyang’ for
addressing the disabled should spur political awakening and
intellectual currents among the
Dear Avinash,
if all the demands of the "divyangs" like 3% reservation, nomination
to the upper house etc are accepted, still, this "divyang" would
remain problematic for me. this mythologising of disabled people is an
attempt to shift the focus away from the miserable siuation which most
of us
Dear Anirban
I could not have said it better.
Thank you.
सादर / With thanks & Regards
राजेश आसुदानी Rajesh Asudani
सहायक महाप्रबन्धक AGM
बाजार आसूचना ईकाई MIU
भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक Reserve Bank of India
नागपुर Nagpur
0712 2806846
President
VIBEWA
Co-Moderator
VIB-India
A-pilll = Action coupled
Amen Anirban
Traditionally, the Indian mythology has depicted disable people as
cruel souls. Now this shift to 'divyang' suggested by the head of the
government through publick broadcast is even more frightening. We have
all reason to discard such unilateral imposition of will by the Prime
dear avinash
the government is also indulging in false propaganda to justify the
use of divyang. today in the morning news at 8 A M there was a news
that the hearing impaired students of U P spent some time in
understanding the meaning of divyang and were elated after getting the
meaning of
27 matches
Mail list logo