Hi ACCMailers ...
I think this discussion is beginning to drift off-topic, and we should
not be talking about the respective merits of UUCP and other internet
protocols. (By the way, there is an excellent mailing list for such
matters at http://www.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history/ )
Dear Gerry,
Am 24.08.2003, um 22:29, gab Gerry zu Protokoll...
> For some strange reason, Alexander believes that AOL should conform to some
> outdated technology like UUCP. AOL like almost everybody else has long ago
> moved forward.
Even I know sites that still prefer to use UUCP because they
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 01:29:06PM -0700, Gerry wrote:
> At 08:55 PM 8/24/03 +0500, Alexander V. Artukov wrote the following:
> >It is one of the main reasons why UUCP host have no IP address.
> >
> >neften.samen.elektra.ru has no the IP address. In this case whence to get PTR?
> This rant has NO p
At 08:55 PM 8/24/03 +0500, Alexander V. Artukov wrote the following:
As to me the entrance in ACCMAIL is closed, compelled to address on persons.
Johannes M. Posel wrote:
JMP> Fine, at least the MXes are set. I guess AOL does not like your
JMP> lacking PTR:
JMP> | AOL's mail servers may reject c
Dear Alexander,
Am 21.08.2003, um 12:33, gab [EMAIL PROTECTED] zu Protokoll...
> In both cases there was a same mistake (see below).
No, sorry, there was not.
>>- Transcript of session follows -
>> ... while talking to listserv.aol.com.:
> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <<< 45
I post this on behalf of Alexander V. Artukov (alex#neften.samen.elektra.ru)
The last week Eugeny Sattler could not send the message in ACCMAIL.
He has asked me resend his message. Attempt was unsuccessful.
Later I itself tried to send the message in ACCMAIL (see attach),
but also unsuccessfully.
