[Ace] ace - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 100

Dear Kepeng Li, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. ace Session 1 (2:30:00) Tuesday, Morning Session I 0930-1200 Room Name: Collyer size: 250

[Ace] FW: draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-08 - CWT CBOR Tag

Just to highlight this and make it concrete. COSE did the same thing in defining optional tags that can be used. Looking at the CWT document, the tags are being used because without the tag one cannot tell what the security operation is that is being used. However the OAuth-Authz draft is

Re: [Ace] Comments on draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining

Francesca, My first concern is that the messages being send around to do the group communication setup should be, if not identical, highly coordinated in how they are formatted. I don't really want two different sets of messages. I understand, and indeed noted, that the current model of how

Re: [Ace] Comments on draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining

Hi Jim, I support Francesca's thoughts on this. Please, find inline a few more comments. Ciao, /Marco On 2017-10-20 15:20, Francesca Palombini wrote: > Hi Jim, > > I don't think that your statement is correct: as far as I understood the > oscoap-joining document, the RS is the group manager,

Re: [Ace] multicast

Hi Stevie, "Beck, Stefan" writes: > Hi Derek, > > The requirement roughly is: > Assume a few light switches as multicasters and many luminaires as listeners > - turning lights on / off via multicast > The end-2-end processing (multicaster to encrypt the message, the > network

Re: [Ace] Comments on draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining

Hi Jim, I don't think that your statement is correct: as far as I understood the oscoap-joining document, the RS is the group manager, while in the pubsub document (even generalizing it and making a group communication profile as Carsten was suggesting) the entity that does group management is

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-08 - CWT CBOR Tag

I think there are cases when it is use full to have the tag (maybe few) and I think the draft is clear enough in discouraging the usage when not needed. “Its use is optional, and is intended for use in cases in which this information would not otherwise be known.” To write code that supports