Jim - am I right that the text you were suggesting be added to the "kid"
treatment is that in the thread "[Ace] Text for KID in POP" which introduces
the text in
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/v_Ci7kRMC0poffGmrSNYb5-sjrA and
corrects it in
Hello Ben,
Thanks for comments!
On 2018-11-08, 05:56, "Ace on behalf of Damm, Benjamin" wrote:
Hello ace,
We've done an internal review of EDHOC and support its movement towards
RFC. A few questions:
* It isn't clear (to us) how EDHOC's message 2 achieves proof of
