I have deleted things I am not replying to.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Kaduk
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 3:03 PM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-06
Noting that
Noting that there are several points that Jim left to the authors to reply
to, also inline...
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:10:12AM -0700, Jim Schaad wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Kaduk
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 8:56 AM
> To:
On Jul 30, 2019, at 19:10, Jim Schaad wrote:
> From: Benjamin Kaduk
>
> We should be consistent across examples about whether the use of CBOR
> diagnostic notation also requires a disclaimer about "with linebreaks for
> readability".
>
> [JLS] I don't believe that this disclaimer needs to be
Comments inline.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Kaduk
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 8:56 AM
To: draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession@ietf.org
Cc: ace@ietf.org
Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-06
We should be consistent across examples about whether
We should be consistent across examples about whether the use of CBOR
diagnostic notation also requires a disclaimer about "with linebreaks
for readability".
Section 2
Presenter
Party that proves possession of a private key (for asymmetric key
cryptography) or secret key (for
