-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Ludwig Seitz
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 2:09 AM
To: ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] Keeping the same key identifier for groups
On 19/08/2019 22:40, Jim Schaad wrote:
> As Ludwig pointed out during the F2F, it makes far more sense to try
>
On 20/08/2019 11:18, Peter van der Stok wrote:
Example: If you have a CWT authorizing A for audience Z and you now also
need authorization B for audience Z, you should request a CWT for A+B
for audience Z, that replaces your previous one.
Do I understand?
two possibilities:
A and B are
Example: If you have a CWT authorizing A for audience Z and you now also
need authorization B for audience Z, you should request a CWT for A+B
for audience Z, that replaces your previous one.
Do I understand?
two possibilities:
A and B are members of audience Z; no new CWT needed
B is a new
On 19/08/2019 22:40, Jim Schaad wrote:
As Ludwig pointed out during the F2F, it makes far more sense to try and
keep an entity using the same key identifier for as long as possible. This
is in part to make sure that signing keys do not need to be retrieved if
they can be easily cached. In
