Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-05

2019-11-18 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
One more update on this one: I cancelled the last-call request, because my discussions with Ludwig about the core framework indicated a strong chance that we'll want to tweak how rs_cnf works, and we should of course reflect any change to rs_cnf in this document as well. Further updates

Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-05

2019-11-18 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 04:45:04AM +0100, Ludwig Seitz wrote: > On 15/11/2019 13:14, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm mostly just nitpicking in the following comments; the actual content > > here is in good shape. (But some of these are popular things that > > directorate reviewers

Re: [Ace] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-15

2019-11-18 Thread Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
Hi Ben, All addressed, except for the last one. The diff is here https://github.com/SanKumar2015/EST-coaps/commit/53933bb9f9365795f2302baef2e39709ae05 My responses below in Pk> I will wait for your confirmation before I upload version 17. Panos -Original Message- From:

[Ace] ace-key-groupcomm-03

2019-11-18 Thread Peter van der Stok
Hi authors, Many thanks for this document Below my review of the latest version of this document, based on my implementation experience. General point: I find it difficult to understand which secure communication channel is discussed at some points in the document. My suggestion is to name