I want to double-check that I'm understanding you correctly.
The idea is that there's ambiguity about how a CWT 'cnf' claim would get
represented as "equivalent" JWT, and that it may not even be possible for
some 'cnf' values? I'm not entirely sure what the path forward even looks
like, and thus
Thanks for putting the effort in, Brian.
IANA, do you need to assign a new expert to reviewi the JWT Claims
registration request from this document, or are the experts expected to be
self-organizing here?
Thanks,
Ben
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Brian Campbell wrote:
> Apologies,
I started doing testing of my code and I have started to run into some massive
problems with the confirmation claim.The COSE version of the POP key
registrations cause a problem because of the way the registration template in
the document is written. It currently says:
JWT Confirmation
Apologies, I forgot to reply-all at some earlier point and dropped the
mailing lists and other cc's off the thread. Added back now.
And also apologies because I think I need to recuse myself from the DE
responsibility on the JWT registry request here. I've spent more time than
I'd like to admit
