-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Henk Birkholz
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 2:33 PM
To: Jim Schaad ; r...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org;
c...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] RATS Entity Attestation Tokens (EAT) - to be a CWT or not to
be a CWT?
Hi Jim,
I'll take a stake into my
Oh. Yes. Sorry.
Tired and therefore still claiming #notavampire
On 04.03.20 23:46, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On 2020-03-04, at 23:33, Henk Birkholz wrote:
Option 1.) is "out of the question" as a reply from a COSE WG chair.
Option 1.) is "out of the question" as a reply from the author of
On 2020-03-04, at 23:33, Henk Birkholz wrote:
>
> Option 1.) is "out of the question" as a reply from a COSE WG chair.
Option 1.) is "out of the question" as a reply from the author of the COSE
specification.
(And at least one other WG member agrees.)
FTFY…
Grüße, Carsten
Hi Jim,
I'll take a stake into my heart for the group then :) Please note that I
claim that there is no evidence that I am a vampire nor that I am the
provenance of option 1.).
I tried to phrase the output of the last virtual interim as neutral as
possible and I think your reply is to be
Henk,
Well you have definitely written a message designed to get a response from me.
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Henk Birkholz
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 10:41 AM
To: r...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org; c...@ietf.org
Subject: [Ace] RATS Entity Attestation Tokens (EAT) - to be
On 2020-03-04, at 19:40, Henk Birkholz wrote:
>
> 1.) go to COSE and ask for a "null signature",
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_Say_No
> 2.) go to ACE and ask for an "unsigned token" option, or
> 3.) go to CBOR and ask for a tag for "naked" CWT Claim Sets (i.e., that are
> not signed).
I
Hi RATS enthusiasts,
hi ACE,
hi CBOR,
in the RATS WG we had a lot of discussions about the nature of an Entity
Attestation Token (EAT):
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-eat/
> https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/
A bit of (hopefully useful) context: an EAT is one way to
