Re: [Ace] WGLC review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-07

2020-09-24 Thread Cigdem Sengul
Hello, Yes, I interpreted it as it can provide null value if it wants to. And, since it is listed as one of the parameters to add, I assumed it would, otherwise, put the profile value. In any case, it is not a huge problem from my side to remove it from the mqtt draft. Kind regards, --Cigdem On

Re: [Ace] WGLC review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-07

2020-09-24 Thread Francesca Palombini
Hi Ludwig, Thank you for the lightning quick reply! I think that maybe something on the lines of “The client MUST NOT send a non-empty “ace_profile” parameter.” in 5.6.1. I think the confusion might have come from the term “can”, “it can send an empty parameter” does not imply that “it must

Re: [Ace] WGLC review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-07

2020-09-24 Thread Seitz Ludwig
Hello Francesca, Cigdem, I believe I know the reason for the confusion: Earlier versions of the framework allowed the clients to indicate a preference for a specific profile by sending in values with the “ace_profile” parameter in the access token request. This option was removed because we

Re: [Ace] WGLC review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-07

2020-09-24 Thread Francesca Palombini
Hi Cigdem, Thanks for the quick reply! Answers inline. To Ludwig and the WG, which might not otherwise see the comment: Cigdem and I have a different interpretations of what the framework allows to put in the “ace_profile” parameter in the request from Client to AS (See (***) below). I think