I oppose adoption.
IETF in the past has come up with SCEP, CMP, CMC and EST, all of them for the
most part doing the same thing with minor differences. I don’t think we need
two enrollment protocols to run over COAP. We should not repeat mistakes of the
past.
In ACE we have EST-coaps wh
Thanks to Mohit for his request on rechartering and adoption. I support this.
Hendrik
Mohit Sahni , Montag, 5. Oktober 2020 09:21
Hello Ace WG,
I am presenting the draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-01 to be adopted by
ACE WG. This document supplements the "Lightweight CMP Profile" draft
(
Hello Ace WG,
I am presenting the draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-01 to be adopted
by ACE WG. This document supplements the "*Lightweight CMP Profile" draft (*
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brockhaus-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile-03
*) *which specify the modifications to the CMPv2 protoco
