Re: [Ace] please welcome Loganaden Velvindron as ACE co-chair!

2021-02-11 Thread Marco Tiloca
Welcome, Loganaden! Best, /Marco On 2021-02-11 22:45, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Hi all, > > Please join me in welcoming Loganaden Velvindron as new ACE co-chair, > joining Daniel Migault who is continuing as co-chair. > > Loganaden, thanks for taking on the role, and I look forward to working with

Re: [Ace] please welcome Loganaden Velvindron as ACE co-chair!

2021-02-11 Thread Daniel Migault
Welcome Logan! Yours, Daniel On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 4:46 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Hi all, > > Please join me in welcoming Loganaden Velvindron as new ACE co-chair, > joining Daniel Migault who is continuing as co-chair. > > Loganaden, thanks for taking on the role, and I look forward to

[Ace] please welcome Loganaden Velvindron as ACE co-chair!

2021-02-11 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi all, Please join me in welcoming Loganaden Velvindron as new ACE co-chair, joining Daniel Migault who is continuing as co-chair. Loganaden, thanks for taking on the role, and I look forward to working with you more! -Ben ___ Ace mailing list

[Ace] interim meetings moving to Tuesday

2021-02-11 Thread Daniel Migault
BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 10.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Eastern Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20191101T02 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 TZNAME:Standard Time END:STANDARD

[Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-aif

2021-02-11 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi, As discussed during the meeting, this email starts a WGLC for the document draft-ietf-ace-aif. The WGLC ends on March 25, so please provide your feed backs, comments reviews. The document is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-aif/ Yours, Daniel -- Daniel

Re: [Ace] [Russ Mundy] Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14

2021-02-11 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi, Thanks for the feed back Francesca. We have discussed this issue during the interim meeting, so I would encourage Olaf and Stefanie to propose some text that reflected the discussion before pinging Russ. Yours, Daniel On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:02 AM Francesca Palombini <

Re: [Ace] [Russ Mundy] Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14

2021-02-11 Thread Francesca Palombini
Hi, I am fine with Daniel's change to the DTLS profile (which wants to add motivation on why the DTLS profile is RECOMMENDED), and prefer Göran's formulation to the Ace framework. I had to think about it and figured out where the different interpretations come from, and hence what needs to

[Ace] Content-Formats for ACE AIF

2021-02-11 Thread Carsten Bormann
Together with a few media types, ACE AIF registers two content-format numbers. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ace-aif-01.html#name-content-format Excerpts below. Please review and assign content-format numbers. Grüße, Carsten 5.3. Content-Format IANA is requested to

[Ace] [media-types] ACE AIF media types

2021-02-11 Thread Carsten Bormann
The ACE AIF specification makes a number of media type registrations: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ace-aif-01.html#name-media-types-2 Excerpts below. Please review. Grüße, Carsten 5.1. Media Types IANA is requested to add the following Media-Type to the "Media Types"

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-aif-01.txt

2021-02-11 Thread Carsten Bormann
I filled in the remaining todos and idnits for ACE AIF. I believe this is now ready for WGLC. Grüße, Carsten > >Title : An Authorization Information Format (AIF) for ACE >Author : Carsten Bormann > Filename: draft-ietf-ace-aif-01.txt >

[Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-aif-01.txt

2021-02-11 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments WG of the IETF. Title : An Authorization Information Format (AIF) for ACE Author :

Re: [Ace] [Russ Mundy] Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14

2021-02-11 Thread Stefanie Gerdes
On 02/11/2021 04:26 AM, Daniel Migault wrote: > > OLD: section 6.2 > "Profiles MUST specify how communication security according >to the requirements in Section 5 is provided." > NEW: > section 6.2 is focused on security but the security requirements are > provided in section 5. We may