Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-02-07 Thread George Fletcher
vices with a mix of   logical names and locations. Ciao Hannes *From:*Ace <mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * George Fletcher *Sent:* Dienstag, 29. Januar 2019 14:15 *To:* Ludwig Seitz <mailto:ludwig.se...@ri.se>; ace@ietf.org <mailto:a

Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-02-07 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
019 14:15 To: Ludwig Seitz <mailto:ludwig.se...@ri.se>; ace@ietf.org<mailto:ace@ietf.org>; oa...@ietf.org<mailto:oa...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01 Thank you so much for the background! I believe that s

Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-02-07 Thread George Fletcher
ames and locations. Ciao Hannes *From:*Ace *On Behalf Of *George Fletcher *Sent:* Dienstag, 29. Januar 2019 14:15 *To:* Ludwig Seitz ; ace@ietf.org; oa...@ietf.org *Subject:* Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01 Thank you so much for the backgroun

Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-02-07 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
on the protocol the information is exchanged. Which route is better? I don't care. Ciao Hannes -Original Message- From: Ludwig Seitz Sent: Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2019 16:29 To: Hannes Tschofenig ; ace@ietf.org; oa...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Ace] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth

Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-02-07 Thread Ludwig Seitz
On 07/02/2019 16:15, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: Hi Ludwig, My interpretation of this is that "resource" refers to a single resource No. Here is the text from token exchange (see last sentence): resource [...] Multiple "resource" parameters may be used to indicate that the issued

Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-02-07 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
source" parameters may be used together to indicate multiple target services with a mix of logical names and locations. Ciao Hannes From: Ace On Behalf Of George Fletcher Sent: Dienstag, 29. Januar 2019 14:15 To: Ludwig Seitz ; ace@ietf.org; oa...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-W

Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-02-07 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
oken is intended to be used at the multiple resources listed. Ciao Hannes -Original Message- From: OAuth On Behalf Of Ludwig Seitz Sent: Dienstag, 29. Januar 2019 08:56 To: ace@ietf.org; oa...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Ace] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource

Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-01-29 Thread George Fletcher
Thank you so much for the background! I believe that since the latest draft of the resource indicators spec [1] allows for abstract identifiers, and since a URN is also a URI, you could easily use a URN syntax to accomplish the use case outlined in your email.

Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-01-28 Thread Ludwig Seitz
On 28/01/2019 23:12, George Fletcher wrote: I also don't know that this raises to the level of "concern" but I find the parameter name of "req_aud" odd. Given that the parameter in the resource-indicators spec is 'resource' why not use a parameter name of 'audience'. That said, I have not read

Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-01-28 Thread Brian Campbell
[added ace@ietf.org kinda per suggestion from Mike] I don't know that there are concerns about “req_aud” per se.. Admittedly, I did use the word "concerns" but I was more trying to say that referencing it from the draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators document wasn't needed to address Vittorio's