Hi Mike,
> On 16 Mar 2018, at 10:04, Mike Jones wrote:
>
> Hi Alexey,
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-14 should address
> your comments. Changes motivated by your comments were:
> - Added the text "IANA must only accept registry updates from the Designated
> Ex
Hi Alexey,
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-14 should address
your comments. Changes motivated by your comments were:
- Added the text "IANA must only accept registry updates from the Designated
Experts and should direct all requests for registration to the review mai
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:aamelni...@fastmail.fm]
> Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2018 1:01 PM
> To: Jim Schaad ; The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org; ace-cha...@ietf.org;
> ka...@mit.edu; ace@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018, at 7:39 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
> IANA does ask for the expert review as part of the processing it does
> even for standards track documents. This is because, in part, they are
> responsible for doing the final number assignment. That is which number
> in the range is actual
IANA does ask for the expert review as part of the processing it does even for
standards track documents. This is because, in part, they are responsible for
doing the final number assignment. That is which number in the range is
actually used. The interesting question would be what happens if
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refe