The CBOR Web Token (CWT) specification has been updated to address comments 
received from Internet Engineering Steering Group 
(IESG)<https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/> members.  Changes were:

  *   Cleaned up the descriptions of the numeric ranges of claim keys being 
registered in the registration template for the "CBOR Web Token (CWT) Claims" 
registry, as suggested by Adam Roach.
  *   Clarified the relationships between the JWT and CWT "NumericDate" and 
"StringOrURI" terms, as suggested by Adam Roach.
  *   Eliminated unnecessary uses of the word "type", as suggested by Adam 
Roach.
  *   Added the text "IANA must only accept registry updates from the 
Designated Experts and should direct all requests for registration to the 
review mailing list" from RFC 7519, as suggested by Amanda Baber of IANA, which 
is also intended to address Alexey Melnikov's comment.
  *   Removed a superfluous comma, as suggested by Warren Kumari.
  *   Acknowledged additional reviewers.

Special thanks to Security Area Director Kathleen Moriarty for helping get this 
across the finish line!

The specification is available at:

  *   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-14

An HTML-formatted version is also available at:

  *   http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-14.html

                                                       -- Mike

P.S.  This notice was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1794 and as 
@selfissued<https://twitter.com/selfissued>.
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

Reply via email to