Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-27 Thread Dan Romascanu
;i...@augustcellars.com> > *Cc:* gen-art <gen-...@ietf.org>; ace@ietf.org; ietf <i...@ietf.org>; > Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu>; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token....@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of > draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12 > &

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-27 Thread Jim Schaad
tf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12 Hi Jim, There are still a few problems: 1. The policies and mapping to the values ranges are hidden in the Claim Key field in the template (the comment also made by Kathleen) [JLS] True, but not an issue

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-27 Thread Mike Jones
draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token....@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12 Hi Jim, There are still a few problems: 1. The policies and mapping to the values ranges are hidden in the Claim Key field in the template (the comment also made by Kathleen) Per my

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-27 Thread Mike Jones
gmail.com>; 'Benjamin Kaduk' <ka...@mit.edu> Cc: 'gen-art' <gen-...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org; 'ietf' <i...@ietf.org>; ace@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12 Integer values between -256 a

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-27 Thread Jim Schaad
Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> Cc: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>; gen-art <gen-...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org; ietf <i...@ietf.org>; ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12 Hi, See also my

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-27 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:59:50AM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote: > Hi, > > See also my other notes. > > I believe that what the document tries to say is: > > Register R is divided into four different ranges R1, R2, R3, R4 (defining > the value limits may be useful) > > Values in range R1 are

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-27 Thread Dan Romascanu
Hi, See also my other notes. I believe that what the document tries to say is: Register R is divided into four different ranges R1, R2, R3, R4 (defining the value limits may be useful) Values in range R1 are allocated according to policy P1 in the case that ... Values in range R2 are allocated

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-26 Thread Dan Romascanu
ry 26, 2018 1:19 PM >> *To:* Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> >> *Cc:* gen-art <gen-...@ietf.org>; ace@ietf.org; ietf <i...@ietf.org>; >> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org >> *Subject:* Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-toke

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-26 Thread Dan Romascanu
org>; ace@ietf.org; ietf <i...@ietf.org>; > draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token....@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12 > > > > Hi Jim, > > Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments. > > On item #2: > &g

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-26 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:03:07AM -0800, Dan Romascanu wrote: > > 1. CWT is derived from JWT (RFC 7519) using CBOR rather than JSON for > encoding. > The rationale as explained in the document is related to efficiency for some > IoT systems. The initial claims registry defined in Section 9.1 is

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-26 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:19:04PM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments. > > On item #2: > > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From:

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-26 Thread Jim Schaad
From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 1:19 PM To: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> Cc: gen-art <gen-...@ietf.org>; ace@ietf.org; ietf <i...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org Subject: Re: Genart telechat re

Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-26 Thread Dan Romascanu
Hi Jim, Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments. On item #2: On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com] > > > > ... > > > > 2. I am a little confused by

[Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

2018-02-26 Thread Dan Romascanu
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new