;i...@augustcellars.com>
> *Cc:* gen-art <gen-...@ietf.org>; ace@ietf.org; ietf <i...@ietf.org>;
> Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu>; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token....@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of
> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12
>
&
tf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12
Hi Jim,
There are still a few problems:
1. The policies and mapping to the values ranges are hidden in the Claim Key
field in the template (the comment also made by Kathleen)
[JLS] True, but not an issue
draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token....@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12
Hi Jim,
There are still a few problems:
1. The policies and mapping to the values ranges are hidden in the Claim Key
field in the template (the comment also made by Kathleen)
Per my
gmail.com>; 'Benjamin Kaduk' <ka...@mit.edu>
Cc: 'gen-art' <gen-...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org;
'ietf' <i...@ietf.org>; ace@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12
Integer values between -256 a
Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu>
Cc: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>; gen-art <gen-...@ietf.org>;
draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org; ietf <i...@ietf.org>; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12
Hi,
See also my
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:59:50AM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See also my other notes.
>
> I believe that what the document tries to say is:
>
> Register R is divided into four different ranges R1, R2, R3, R4 (defining
> the value limits may be useful)
>
> Values in range R1 are
Hi,
See also my other notes.
I believe that what the document tries to say is:
Register R is divided into four different ranges R1, R2, R3, R4 (defining
the value limits may be useful)
Values in range R1 are allocated according to policy P1 in the case that ...
Values in range R2 are allocated
ry 26, 2018 1:19 PM
>> *To:* Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>
>> *Cc:* gen-art <gen-...@ietf.org>; ace@ietf.org; ietf <i...@ietf.org>;
>> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-toke
org>; ace@ietf.org; ietf <i...@ietf.org>;
> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token....@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12
>
>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments.
>
> On item #2:
>
&g
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:03:07AM -0800, Dan Romascanu wrote:
>
> 1. CWT is derived from JWT (RFC 7519) using CBOR rather than JSON for
> encoding.
> The rationale as explained in the document is related to efficiency for some
> IoT systems. The initial claims registry defined in Section 9.1 is
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:19:04PM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments.
>
> On item #2:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From:
From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 1:19 PM
To: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>
Cc: gen-art <gen-...@ietf.org>; ace@ietf.org; ietf <i...@ietf.org>;
draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Genart telechat re
Hi Jim,
Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments.
On item #2:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> >
>
> ...
> >
> > 2. I am a little confused by
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
14 matches
Mail list logo