Ace on behalf of Marco Tiloca
Date: Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 13:52
To: Jim Schaad , Ace Wg
Subject: Re: [Ace] Jim's Proposal on legal requestor
Hi Jim,
On 2020-02-26 18:59, Jim Schaad wrote:
From: Ace <mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of
Marco Tiloca
Sent: Wednesday, Februar
Hi Jim,
On 2020-02-26 18:59, Jim Schaad wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ace *On Behalf Of *Marco Tiloca
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 26, 2020 6:08 AM
> *To:* Michael Richardson ; Jim Schaad
> ; ace@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Ace] Jim's Proposal on legal requestor
From: Ace On Behalf Of Marco Tiloca
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 6:08 AM
To: Michael Richardson ; Jim Schaad
; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] Jim's Proposal on legal requestor
Hi!
Jim, I think now I understand your idea and it makes sense to me.
Some comments in line below
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 5:17 AM
To: Jim Schaad ; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] Jim's Proposal on legal requestor
clarifying question.
Jim Schaad wrote:
> I do not seem to have been doing a good
Hi!
Jim, I think now I understand your idea and it makes sense to me.
Some comments in line below.
Best,
/Marco
On 2020-02-26 14:17, Michael Richardson wrote:
> clarifying question.
>
> Jim Schaad wrote:
> > I do not seem to have been doing a good job of explaining the issue
> > that
clarifying question.
Jim Schaad wrote:
> I do not seem to have been doing a good job of explaining the issue
> that I am raising here, so I am going to go scenario based for a
> description.
> (1) I get an access token from an AS with a scope of [
> "coap://multicast-01",
