Re: [Ace] Replay ... RE: WGLC feedback on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-02

2018-06-25 Thread Roman Danyliw
Hi Hannes! > -Original Message- > From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@arm.com] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 9:36 AM > To: Roman Danyliw ; ace@ietf.org > Subject: Replay ... RE: WGLC feedback on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of- > possession-02 > > Hi Rom

Re: [Ace] Replay ... RE: WGLC feedback on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-02

2018-06-22 Thread Mike Jones
I agree with this proposed update and will apply it to the editor's draft. -Original Message- From: Ace On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 6:36 AM To: Roman Danyliw ; ace@ietf.org Subject: [Ace] Replay ... RE: WGLC feedback on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof

[Ace] Replay ... RE: WGLC feedback on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-02

2018-06-22 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi Roman, Thanks for your review. As I was re-reading the reviews I spotted this comment: > (14) (Editorial) Page 8, Section 4, Per "Replay can also be avoided if a > sub-key is derived from a shared secret that is specific to the instance of > the PoP demonstration." PoP is spelled out