Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-03

2017-04-05 Thread Jim Schaad
t: Sunday, April 2, 2017 10:58 PM To: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com <mailto:i...@augustcellars.com> > Cc: draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org> ; ace <Ace@ietf.org <mailto:Ace@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Ace] Revie

Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-03

2017-04-05 Thread Mike Jones
PM To: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> Cc: draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org; ace <Ace@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-03 Thanks for the review Jim, See inline comments On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Jim Schaad <i...@augustcella

Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-03

2017-04-04 Thread Jim Schaad
Some comments inline From: Samuel Erdtman [mailto:sam...@erdtman.se] Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 10:58 PM To: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> Cc: draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org; ace <Ace@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-0

Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-03

2017-04-03 Thread Jim Schaad
or-web-to...@ietf.org; ace <Ace@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-03 Thanks for the review Jim, See inline comments On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> wrote: Given that it was stated that the authors believe

[Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-03

2017-03-31 Thread Jim Schaad
Given that it was stated that the authors believe that the document was ready for publication, I decided to do another review pass. 1. Following the discussion in the SET WG meeting, I believe that it would be reasonable to define some inputs for the external data fields to allow for