t: Sunday, April 2, 2017 10:58 PM
To: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com <mailto:i...@augustcellars.com> >
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org
<mailto:draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org> ; ace <Ace@ietf.org
<mailto:Ace@ietf.org> >
Subject: Re: [Ace] Revie
PM
To: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org; ace <Ace@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-03
Thanks for the review Jim,
See inline comments
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Jim Schaad
<i...@augustcella
Some comments inline
From: Samuel Erdtman [mailto:sam...@erdtman.se]
Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 10:58 PM
To: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org; ace <Ace@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-0
or-web-to...@ietf.org; ace <Ace@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-03
Thanks for the review Jim,
See inline comments
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> wrote:
Given that it was stated that the authors believe
Given that it was stated that the authors believe that the document was
ready for publication, I decided to do another review pass.
1. Following the discussion in the SET WG meeting, I believe that it would
be reasonable to define some inputs for the external data fields to allow
for