-of-possession
context storage
|| |
| OSCORE Request -> | |
|| |
| <--- OSCORE Response - | |
| ... | |
--
ce@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile
John,
I am wondering if this is really the document that should be dealing with
this collision problem. A number of the collisions that might occur are going
to be out of the ACE scope and a more gen
son , "ace@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile
Hi,
Just want to acknowledge, as was discussed in the WG meeting today, that the
major comment below is alternatively a possible -bis update. I think this is
good functionality, and even though related pro
, this should definitly
be added.
John
-Original Message-
From: Jim Schaad
Date: Tuesday, 8 September 2020 at 21:14
To: John Mattsson , Göran Selander
, "ace@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile
John,
I am wondering if this is really the document t
to be a common problem across all of these
different ways of getting OSCORE contexts established.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of John Mattsson
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 12:40 AM
To: Göran Selander ; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile
f.org"
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile
Hi,
Just want to acknowledge, as was discussed in the WG meeting today, that the
major comment below is alternatively a possible -bis update. I think this is
good functionality, and even though related problem statements
Hi,
I have reviewed the latest GitHub version of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile
https://ace-wg.github.io/ace-oscore-profile/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile.html
In general this draft looks very good. I have one major comments, and several
more minor comments.
Major comment
---
-
