; Daniel Migault
Cc: ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] comment on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-26
If you are using JSON-based interactions, I believe that the most
straightforward way is to refer to RFC6749 for the error messages as you
currently do. I don't find this confusing or problematic
, November 21, 2019 10:27 AM
To: Daniel Migault
Cc: Ludwig Seitz; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] comment on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-26
Hello,
Ludwig, I agree that the current draft describes specifically for when CBOR is
used.
When CBOR is not used, I have read it as it will act similar
To: Daniel Migault ; 'Cigdem Sengul'
Cc: ace@ietf.org; 'Ludwig Seitz'
Subject: RE: [Ace] comment on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-26
Daniel,
I don’t understand why you want to follow a different specification for the
error interactions in this case. I don’t see any reason not to following
[ace
10:49 PM
To: Cigdem Sengul
Cc: ace@ietf.org; Ludwig Seitz ; Daniel Migault
Subject: Re: [Ace] comment on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-26
Thank you Ludwig and Cigdem,
I would effectively prefer to have one reference, i.e ace-oauth-authz. I also
reviewed the text from ace-oauth-authz
already. I will
>> have a closer look at it, and ask mqtt-profile to confirm the current text
>> is fine.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Daniel
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ace On Behalf Of Ludwig Seitz
>> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 10:51
k at it, and ask mqtt-profile to confirm the current text
> is fine.
>
> Thanks!
> Daniel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ace On Behalf Of Ludwig Seitz
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 10:51 AM
> To: ace@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ace] comment on draft-ietf-ac
already. I will have a
closer look at it, and ask mqtt-profile to confirm the current text is fine.
Thanks!
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Ludwig Seitz
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 10:51 AM
To: ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] comment on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz
Hi,
This only concerns potential clarification of the text.
While reviewing mqtt-profile draft I raised an issue regarding the
reference for Oauth [RFC6749] while the remaining of the document
references draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz [1]. My reading of
draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz section 5.6.3
