Göran Selander wrote:
> In issue 16 it was requested to allow multiple uses of ephemeral keys
> and it was added in the security considerations. I think it makes sense
> to mandate the verification of nonce uniqueness during reuse of
> ephemeral keys and have reopened issue 16:
Hi Michael,
Please see the latest version of EDHOC:
https://ericssonresearch.github.io/EDHOC/
The draft has gone through a number of reviews and is in many ways
rewritten. We will submit a new version next week. Inline:
On 2017-02-24 03:08, "Michael Richardson" wrote:
>
>It says:
>>4.3.2. me
It says:
>4.3.2. message_1 -> V
>
> Party V processes the received message_1 as follows:
>
> o Party V SHALL verify that the nonce has not been received before.
> If the verification fails, the message MUST be discarded.
> Otherwise, Party V SHALL store a representation of th
