Migault
Cc: Loganaden Velvindron ; Olaf Bergmann
; draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org
; Russ Mundy ; Ace Wg
; Stefanie Gerdes ; Francesca Palombini
Subject: Re: [Ace] secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14
Hi Daniel,
I just submitted -38 which includes these changes and some nits
ot;draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org"
, Loganaden Velvindron
Subject: Re: [Ace] secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14
HI Goran,
sure any wordsmithing / alternative are fine to me. For the second
alternative the repetition of "with" may
beginning of next week when ID submission
> has reopened.
>
> Regards
> Göran
>
>
>
> On 2021-03-04, 15:54, "Daniel Migault" wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
> I know everyone is very busy by now, but I am wondering if you
> could prov
4 March 2021 at 17:49
To: Göran Selander
Cc: Stefanie Gerdes , Olaf Bergmann ,
Francesca Palombini , Russ Mundy
, "draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org"
, Loganaden Velvindron
Subject: Re: [Ace] secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14
HI Goran,
*Daniel Migault
> *Date: *Thursday, 4 March 2021 at 17:49
> *To: *Göran Selander
> *Cc: *Stefanie Gerdes , Olaf Bergmann ,
> Francesca Palombini , Russ Mundy <
> mu...@tislabs.com>, "draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org" <
> draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@iet
March 2021 at 17:49
To: Göran Selander
Cc: Stefanie Gerdes , Olaf Bergmann ,
Francesca Palombini , Russ Mundy
, "draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org"
, Loganaden Velvindron
Subject: Re: [Ace] secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14
HI Goran,
sure any wordsmithin
Thanks for the feedbacks Olaf. So I understand why we need such flexibility
on the client side. The main reason seems that the communication with the
AS is seen as bootstrapping the communication between the client and the RS
and as such we would like to keep them as independent as possible.
I
Hi Daniel,
On 2021-03-02, Daniel Migault wrote:
> This is just a follow-up. I would like to be able to close this issue
> by the end of the week, and so far I have not heard any issues for
> profile mandating a protocol. On the other hand, not mandating a
> specific protocol comes with
e:
>>
>> * OSCORE profile mandating the AS to support OSCORE and have the C
>> <-> AS using OSCORE.
>> * DTLS profile mandating the AS to support DTLS and have the C <-> AS
>> using DTLS.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yours,
>> Dan
s,
> Daniel
>
>
> From: Russ Mundy
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 3:38 PM
> To: Daniel Migault
> Cc: Russ Mundy ; Stefanie Gerdes ;
> Daniel Migault ; Francesca Palombini <
> francesca.palomb...@ericsson
rdes ; Daniel
Migault ; Francesca Palombini
; Göran Selander
; Olaf Bergmann
; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14
Hi Daniel & others,
Thanks for the continuing effort to make the documents more clear and
understandable.
I thi
Subject: Re: [Ace] secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14
Hi Daniel & others,
Thanks for the continuing effort to make the documents more clear and
understandable.
I think that there may be a fairly fundamental difficulty understanding
(possibly on my part) about the inten
ergm...@tzi.org>>; ace@ietf.org
> <mailto:ace@ietf.org> mailto:ace@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Re: [Ace] secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 02/16/2021 04:53 PM, Daniel Migault wrote:
>
> > Section 5:
> > OLD
&g
Palombini
Cc: Göran Selander ; Russ Mundy
; Olaf Bergmann ; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14
Hi Daniel,
On 02/16/2021 04:53 PM, Daniel Migault wrote:
> Section 5:
> OLD
> "Profiles MUST specify a communication security protocol
Hi Daniel,
On 02/16/2021 04:53 PM, Daniel Migault wrote:
> Section 5:
> OLD
> "Profiles MUST specify a communication security protocol that provides
>the features required above."
> NEW
> "Profiles MUST specify at least one communication security protocol that
> provides the features
, 2021 10:16 AM
To: Daniel Migault ; Francesca Palombini
Cc: Göran Selander ; Russ Mundy
; Olaf Bergmann ; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14
Hi,
I propose that we use the following text for the ACE framework (as originally
proposed by Göran
Hi,
I propose that we use the following text for the ACE framework (as
originally proposed by Göran):
Section 6.2:
OLD
"Profiles MUST specify how communication security according
to the requirements in Section 5 is provided."
NEW
"The requirements for communication security of profiles are
17 matches
Mail list logo
