Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

Sorry for being late- I also support adoption of this draft as it is a natural optimization of EST making use of existing IoT device stacks. Göran On 2018-01-30 21:23, "Ace on behalf of Jim Schaad" wrote: >This is the start of a two

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

I support WG adoption of the document as an enabler for devices that support CoAP but not HTTP to enroll with an EST CA. It also allows them to bootstrap using the BRSKI process. Brian -Original Message- From: Ace [mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

I support the WG adoption of this document. It will be a useful component to create a security solution for IoT devices. On the current or a future version of this draft I can do a review, also. Best regards Esko Dijk -Original Message- From: Ace [mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org] On

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

I support the adoption of this draft. There is a great need for a standards based mechanism for secure enrollment of constrained endpoints, which this draft provides. Thanks Rupak -Original Message- From: Ace [mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad Sent: Tuesday, January

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

I support the adoption of this draft. The industrial IoT sector is establishing certificate based secure communications and will need a secure means to manage these certificates. With the use of CoAp in that space, this draft can be the what/how to achieve just that. Warm regards, Nancy On

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

ack to UDP/CoAP." --> Remove "networks of" - From: Ace [mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shahid Raza Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 11:56 AM To: Sandeep Kumar <sandeep.ku...@philips.com> Cc: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>; ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] W

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

As a co-author, I also strongly support the adoption of this draft as a WG document. Recall that , we already have an implementation of this draft, both in constrained devices (SICS Contiki) and in the Nexus CA software. Recently, we have also implemented the "integration of this draft into

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

As co-author, I support adoption of the draft as WG document. There is need in industry and multiple standardization bodies for this draft. Regards Sandeep -Original Message- From: Ace [mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 9:23 PM To:

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

Hi Jim, I agree that this document should be adopted.  I am willing to review and comment. Eli On 30.01.18 21:23, Jim Schaad wrote: > This is the start of a two week call for input on the adoption of the WG of > the document draft-vanderstok-ace-est. The document has been presented at > the