[Ace] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-13

Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty Review result: Ready Thank you for your work on this document, it appears ready for publication. ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

Re: [Ace] [Secdispatch] EDHOC

man Danyliw wrote: > > Hi Kathleen! > > Yes. A doodle poll to determine the most agreeable time the week of March 4 > was just sent: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/KU3SWW_4UeJ9JMH9abmzaKeXXgc > > Roman > > > From: Kathle

Re: [Ace] [Secdispatch] EDHOC

Thanks for the very helpful message, Goran. A couple of comments inline. On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:31 AM Göran Selander wrote: > Hi Richard, Roman, all > > > > Thanks for kind welcome and for progressing the discussion. Apologies for > a long email. > > > > *From: *Richard Barnes > > > >

Re: [Ace] [Secdispatch] EDHOC

ling list :) > >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:06 PM Kathleen Moriarty >> wrote: >> Can that be a public thread? It really should be. >> >> Sent from my mobile device >> >> > On Jan 18, 2019, at 11:54 AM, Richard Barnes wrote: >> > >

Re: [Ace] [Secdispatch] EDHOC

' humble point of view we believe that the main missing >> thing that would enable the required further discussion is that the IETF >> endorses this work, no matter how, so that people dare invest more time in >> implementation and analysis. >> >> Best regards, >

Re: [Ace] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)

Thank you. Sent from my mobile device > On Mar 14, 2018, at 6:31 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Thanks. I have no objection to this draft proceeding as-si > >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Mike Jones >> wrote: >> Thanks, Ekr. One more reply to

Re: [Ace] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mike and authors, Could you please respond to see if we can wrap this up? Thanks, Kathleen On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: No Objection > > When responding,

Re: [Ace] AD Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

65536 are > marked as Private Use. > > Thanks again, > -- Mike > > -Original Message- > From: Ace <ace-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Kathleen Moriarty > Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 12:42 PM >

[Ace] AD Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

Hello, Thanks for your work on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12 The draft looks good and I'll kick off IETF last call today, but have an important question that may require clarification in the draft. In the IANA section 9.1, how does one know which document type is needed? Could you add text

Re: [Ace] ACE github repos

Thank you, Francesca! On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Ludwig Seitz wrote: > Hello ACE, > > just a heads-up to tell you that thanks to Francesca we now have an ACE > github organization here: https://github.com/ace-wg > > This contains the following drafts: > >

Re: [Ace] CWT - Audience

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On Oct 31, 2017, at 10:42, Samuel Erdtman wrote: >> >> My guess is that this is an early mistake that has not been noticed, it has >> been like this from the first draft. > > I sure noticed the

[Ace] Chairs

I would like to thank both Hannes and Kepeng for serving as ACE chairs for the last 3+ years. Kepeng is not able to attend the Singapore meeting, and while is very interested to continue work in the IETF, he doesn't have the support at the moment and thought it was best to resign for now. He

Re: [Ace] Doodle for ACE virtual interim meeting in Oct

<hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote: > I agree with Kepeng that we also wanted to discuss the certificate > enrollment in addition to the Wiki. > > On 09/27/2017 05:23 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: >> Hello Kepeng, >> >> The interim should also be to discuss the profiles a

Re: [Ace] Doodle for ACE virtual interim meeting in Oct

Hello Kepeng, The interim should also be to discuss the profiles as that was a priority from the WG session in Prague. Goran pulled together the wiki, now it's up to the WG participants to check the wiki and amend as needed to allow for a productive session. Or did you plan on two interims?

Re: [Ace] Volunteer to set up the wiki

ble to have meaningful conversations on profiles and prioritizing them will be very helpful toward forward progress. Best regards, Kathleen > > > Best regards, > Göran > > > > On 2017-09-12 16:16, "Ace on behalf of Kathleen Moriarty" > <ace-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of

Re: [Ace] Summary of ACE Group Communication Security Discussion

Is anyone willing to work on a draft to be ready in advance of the Chicago meeting so we have a concrete proposal for asymmetric keys? Thanks, Kathleen Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device > On Nov 17, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Rene Struik wrote: > > Dear

Re: [Ace] Summary of ACE Group Communication Security Discussion

This time as AD. Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device > On Sep 26, 2016, at 11:41 AM, Michael StJohns wrote: > >> On 9/26/2016 8:30 AM, kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com wrote: >> Without a hat on, you can add my support to Abhinav's proposal. Perfect is >>