Re: [Ace] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-03-08 Thread Jim Schaad
om> > Cc: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org; ace- > cha...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token- > 13: (with COMMENT) > > Thanks, Ben and Adam. I've recoded a note to address

Re: [Ace] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-03-07 Thread Mike Jones
:28 PM To: Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>; Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> Cc: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org; ace-cha...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT) On 3/7

Re: [Ace] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-03-07 Thread Adam Roach
On 3/7/18 11:47 PM, Mike Jones wrote: The point of including new CWT definitions for "StringOrURI" and "NumericDate" was so that we could use them directly. Prefixing them with "CWT" isn't necessary for the meaning to be clear in context. Given that the current formulation confused both

Re: [Ace] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-03-07 Thread Mike Jones
-- Mike -Original Message- From: Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 8:24 PM To: Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com> Cc: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-to...@ietf.org; ace-cha...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: Adam Roach's